Public Art & Health

Nature imagery, visual art and neuroaesthetics

Research record PAH-035 · Finding, limitations, sources and publication relationships.

Back to the research library

· 2025 · International

Findings, methods and sources

Healthcare artReviewContext / synthesis

Finding. A 2025 review brings healthcare-design studies into dialogue with neuroaesthetics.

Limitation. Different evidence types are discussed together. Proposed neural explanations should not be presented as measured clinical effects.

Cardillo ER, Chatterjee A. Benefits of nature imagery and visual art in healthcare contexts: a view from empirical aesthetics. Buildings. 2025;15(7):1027. doi:10.3390/buildings15071027

Methods and verification

Verification level: Abstract checked

Design
Review
Sample / scope
See source for sample and design
Setting
Healthcare contexts
Art form
Several or unspecified

Citation checked against Crossref and abstract against the publisher or OpenAlex record, 29 September 2026

Last full editorial audit: 2026-09-09 · Verification policy

Publications and overlap

No confirmed shared-publication match is recorded for this entry in Edition 4.11. Source-by-source and participant-level reconciliation is incomplete; this does not establish an independent study.

How records are counted

Share and cite

This citation identifies the repository entry. To cite the research finding, use the original publication listed above.

Public Art & Health. Nature imagery, visual art and neuroaesthetics. Research record PAH-035. Edition 4.11, 29 September 2026. https://www.publicart.health/research/pah-035

Download citation (TXT)

Suggest a correction to this record