Public Art & Health

A critique of the evidence for arts-based interventions

Research record PAH-065 · Finding, limitations, sources and publication relationships.

Back to the research library

· 2025 · International

Findings, methods and sources

Adjacent evidenceReviewContext / synthesis

Finding. Argues that the evidence cited for arts-based interventions is weaker than claimed: many studies do not define the artistic component, randomise allocation, control for concurrent interventions or report analyses appropriately.

Limitation. Addresses arts-based interventions broadly, most of them participatory, rather than installed art. Contested: see PAH-066.

Skov M, Nadal M. Can arts-based interventions improve health? A conceptual and methodological critique. Phys Life Rev. 2025;53:239–259.

Methods and verification

Verification level: Abstract or primary source checked

Design
Conceptual and methodological critique
Sample / scope
Studies cited as evidence for arts-based interventions
Setting
Clinical and health-policy contexts
Art form
Several or unspecified

Abstract or primary source checked, 28 September 2026 · Verification source

Editorial review: 2026-09-28 · Verification policy

Publications and overlap

No confirmed shared-publication match is recorded for this entry in Edition 4.11. Source-by-source and participant-level reconciliation is incomplete; this does not establish an independent study.

How records are counted

Share and cite

This citation identifies the repository entry. To cite the research finding, use the original publication listed above.

Public Art & Health. A critique of the evidence for arts-based interventions. Research record PAH-065. Edition 4.11, 29 September 2026. https://www.publicart.health/research/pah-065

Download citation (TXT)

Suggest a correction to this record