Findings, methods and sources
Finding. The healthcare review includes reports of no detectable benefit and some less favourable responses to visual-art interventions.
Limitation. Lack of reported adverse clinical events does not establish universal safety. Proposed explanations such as siting and consultation remain hypotheses.
Foster MW, Sanhueza C, Bahr E, et al. PLoS One. 2025;20(8):e0328215.
Methods and verification
Verification level: Full text assessed
- Design
- Null and negative findings reported within a scoping review
- Sample / scope
- Nine articles reporting null findings; six reporting some negative effect
- Setting
- Various
- Art form
- Several or unspecified
Checked against the full text of the 2025 scoping review in PubMed Central, 29 September 2026
Last full editorial audit: 2026-09-09 · Verification policy
Publications and overlap
These five records cite the same review. PAH-026 also cites a separate accessibility paper. The 2026 correction belongs to this review and is not a new study. The underlying studies included by the review have not been matched against every other record.
Linked records: PAH-004, PAH-005, PAH-007, PAH-026 · Publication