Findings, methods and sources
Finding. The healthcare scoping review found a gap in evaluated receptive-art experiences for people with visual impairment. A separate perspectives paper addresses accessibility.
Limitation. Absence of outcome studies in a review is not absence of accessible practice. Touch-based access requires a suitable work and setting.
Methods and verification
Verification level: Full text assessed
- Design
- Absence identified within a scoping review that permitted such studies
- Sample / scope
- Not applicable
- Setting
- All
- Art form
- Several or unspecified
Checked against the full text of the 2025 scoping review in PubMed Central and the abstract of the perspectives paper, 29 September 2026 · Verification source
Last full editorial audit: 2026-09-09 · Verification policy
Publications and overlap
These five records cite the same review. PAH-026 also cites a separate accessibility paper. The 2026 correction belongs to this review and is not a new study. The underlying studies included by the review have not been matched against every other record.
Linked records: PAH-004, PAH-005, PAH-006, PAH-007 · Publication